Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-java
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-java: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Gentoo Java <gentoo-java@g.o>
From: Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldonkin@...>
Subject: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:33:39 +0100
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe <kasunbg@...> wrote:
> On 24 May 2011, at 14:37, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
>> On 05/23/2011 07:52 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> maven-bin 2.x support continues to work through the binary package?
>>>
>>> Yes, we can keep supporting maven-bin 2.x for maven users. Though the
>>> packagers of projects based on maven won't be able to use the support
>>> for maven 2.x if we start with 3.x.This project's focus is more
>>> towards packagers, right?  I think Serkan or people who are more
>>> familiar with this can give an exact answer.
>>>
>>
>> So are you discussing which version of Maven to build from source or
>> which version to target ebuild infrastructure for? Those two don't
>> necessarily need to be the same and your topic implied the former but
>> the above talks about the latter.
>
> Well, mainly this project is inclined towards packagers.
> But of course the users are targeted too. Currently, users have the
> maven-bin too
> which means they have a choice in hand. The problem with Maven 3 is
> that some important plugins for users are not
> supported yet.

AIUI the situation is more complex than that

maven seems to be moving towards requiring specific core versions for
builds. some  projects i develop require maven 2, some maven 3. i
manage this situation with a set of custom scripts and installations
independent of gentoo. i expect other developers now work in a similar
way. (same goes for jdks.) the gentoo java stuff just gets in my way
now for development.

FWIW one unresolved challenge for linux distributions with the rise of
bytecode languages (such as Java) is that compressed bytecodes are not
binaries in the usual sense (platform dependent machine executable
machine code). i know that it's a hard thing for the linux community
to hear but it's about time that the community acknowledged that these
languages are now mainstream and stop trying to force them into a
inappropriate provisioning model.

Robert


Replies:
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Jörg Schaible
References:
Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Kasun Gajasinghe
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Eric Chatellier
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Kasun Gajasinghe
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Kasun Gajasinghe
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Kasun Gajasinghe
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-java: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Next by thread:
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Previous by date:
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Next by date:
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?


Updated Mar 06, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-java mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.