1 |
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:30:55 +0200, Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Vincent Schut wrote: |
5 |
>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:02:48 +0200, Joshua Nichols |
6 |
>> <nichoj-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>>> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote: |
9 |
>>>> Miroslav Šulc <miroslav.sulc@...> writes: |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>>>> Hi, |
13 |
>>>>> |
14 |
>>>>> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we |
15 |
>>>>> use |
16 |
>>>>> bugs.gentoo.org? |
17 |
>>>>> |
18 |
>>>>> |
19 |
>>>> |
20 |
>>>> I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much... |
21 |
>>>> Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental trac? |
22 |
>>>> (and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected once) |
23 |
>>>> |
24 |
>>>> But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem, |
25 |
>>>> like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know about |
26 |
>>>> it |
27 |
>>>> beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or |
28 |
>>>> WONTFIX. |
29 |
>>>> |
30 |
>>>> |
31 |
>>>> |
32 |
>>> I actually don't think using bugs.gentoo.org would be too bad. |
33 |
>>> Although, it would be preferred if bugs directly to |
34 |
>>> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, so we don't drive |
35 |
>>> bug-wranglers crazy. To this end, I made a 'bookmarkable template' and |
36 |
>>> setup a tinyurl for it: |
37 |
>>> |
38 |
>>> *http://tinyurl.com/ofzha* |
39 |
>>> |
40 |
>>> Please use this for reporting migration-related bugs. It should be |
41 |
>>> preset to be assigned to java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, |
42 |
>>> block the migration bug, and will have [migration-overlay] in the |
43 |
>>> title. |
44 |
>> |
45 |
>> I tried using the tinyurl link to file a bug about tomcat (bug nr. |
46 |
>> 127949), but I think it still went to the normal bug-wranglers. See the |
47 |
>> following reply |
48 |
>> I got: |
49 |
>> |
50 |
>> Display all headersSubject: [Bug 127949] [migration-overlay] |
51 |
>> tomcat-5.5.16 works for amd64 |
52 |
>> To: schut@×××××××××.nl |
53 |
>> From: bugzilla-daemon@g.o |
54 |
>> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:05:09 +0000 |
55 |
>> |
56 |
>> --------- start forward --------- |
57 |
>> Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 |
58 |
>> Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 |
59 |
>> |
60 |
>> |
61 |
>> jakub@g.o changed: |
62 |
>> |
63 |
>> What |Removed |Added |
64 |
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
65 |
>> CC| |java@g.o |
66 |
>> Status|NEW |RESOLVED |
67 |
>> Resolution| |UPSTREAM |
68 |
>> |
69 |
>> |
70 |
>> |
71 |
>> |
72 |
>> ------- Comment #1 from jakub@g.o 2006-03-29 01:05 PST ------- |
73 |
>> Hmmmm, better ask the people who run the overlay... |
74 |
>> |
75 |
>> |
76 |
>> --Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email |
77 |
>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
78 |
>> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. |
79 |
>> --------- end forward --------- |
80 |
> |
81 |
> Well, first, the bug you filed really doesn't have anything to do with |
82 |
> the migration overlay (because it's from the experimental overlay). That |
83 |
> being said, I was working on keywording it around the time you filed it, |
84 |
> and should be fixed. |
85 |
|
86 |
Ah, sorry. I assumed they belonged together. |
87 |
Could someone please tell me then how/where to file bugs regarding the |
88 |
experimental overlay? |
89 |
|
90 |
Vincent. |
91 |
> |
92 |
> As for why it got assigned to bug-wranglers... I think there's an issue |
93 |
> with bugzilla where you can't switch between simple and expert modes for |
94 |
> filing bug. I suspect that this happened with the upgrade a bit back, |
95 |
> and you're stuck with whatever mode you were using at that time. The |
96 |
> feature for assigning directly to someone (ie java@g.o) is one of |
97 |
> the features from expert, so this would explain why it didn't take |
98 |
> effect. |
99 |
> |
100 |
> So, I'll try to have a word with the bug wranglers to make sure these |
101 |
> don't get resolved this way. |
102 |
> |
103 |
> - Josh |
104 |
|
105 |
|
106 |
-- |
107 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |