From: | Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-kernel@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-kernel] New genpatches numbering scheme | ||
Date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:55:45 | ||
Message-Id: | 20060213225524.GA23419@kroah.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-kernel] New genpatches numbering scheme by Daniel Drake |
1 | On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:41:14PM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote: |
2 | > FIXES |
3 | > ===== |
4 | > 1000-1400 linux-stable |
5 | |
6 | Why does this need to be so big? Why not just include the -stable |
7 | patches directly, all rolled up (2.6.15.4), instead of all broken out? |
8 | |
9 | Other than that, I have no problem with the new scheme. |
10 | |
11 | thanks, |
12 | |
13 | greg k-h |
14 | -- |
15 | gentoo-kernel@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-kernel] New genpatches numbering scheme | Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> |