1 |
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 14:01 +0100, John Mylchreest wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:13:42PM -0400, Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > John, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Wait a sec.. systrace was rejected from the hardened kernels. Please |
6 |
> > clarify what this means. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> patches in the 6000 range are excluded from hardened-sources, and are |
9 |
> bundled into a hardened-patches-X.experimental.tar.bz2 patchset. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Basically, the reason is sits in the tree is to follow hardened-sources |
12 |
> development and to ensure the systrace patch is kept up to date as |
13 |
> appropriate for either systrace-sources + hardened, or potentially |
14 |
> integration at some point in the future. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> At the moment its simply just sharing a repo - and these can be safely |
17 |
> ignored. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
great thanks for the clarification. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
> |
24 |
> > On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 17:49 +0000, johnm wrote: |
25 |
> > > A /hardened/2.6/trunk/2.6.16/6001_systrace-2.6.16.patch |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Cheers, |
28 |
> John |
29 |
> |
30 |
-- |
31 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
32 |
Gentoo Linux |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-kernel@g.o mailing list |