1 |
Daniel Drake a écrit : |
2 |
|
3 |
> Are you worried that your kernel might be broken so much that it won't |
4 |
> be able to execute ELF executables? If so, you'd also be screwed on the |
5 |
> script approach, because busybox/ash is also written in C. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
Sorry if i didn't make myself clear. The fact the kernel runs or not elf |
9 |
binaries wasn't the idea. You remember me the time i was used to program |
10 |
in C, i always compiled a simple a.out and tried to debug it with adb |
11 |
because i misused pointers of pointer and casting in order to optimize |
12 |
the code because i had less than 64/512ko of ram to reinvent the world |
13 |
(No, i didn't made all that codes in a garage in my backyard, but they |
14 |
were lost in a faulty 10Mo MFM harddisk for sure. So ended my brillant |
15 |
career :). Anyway, a.out format is mostly replaced with elf format nowadays. |
16 |
|
17 |
Actually, i have spoken about the fact that a program written in a |
18 |
compiled language will not be as flexible as an interpreted one. In |
19 |
other word, /sbin/rc should stay a shell script. I'm pretty sure that |
20 |
will not please to some of you gentoo developers ;) |
21 |
|
22 |
Jj |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-kernel@g.o mailing list |