On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:41:14PM +0000, Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote:
> FIXES
> =====
> 1000-1400	linux-stable
> 1400-1500	linux-stable queue
> 1500-1600	architecture-related
> 1600-1700	security
> 1700-1800	mm/scheduling/misc
> 1800-1900	filesystems
> 1900-2000	networking core
> 2000-2100	storage core
> 2100-2000	power management (acpi, apm)
> 2200-2300	bus (usb, ieee1394, pci, pcmcia, ...)
> 2300-2400	network drivers
> 2400-2500	storage drivers
> 2500-2600	input
> 2600-2800	media (graphics, sound, tv)
> 2800-2900	other
> 2900-4000	reserved
> 
> FEATURES
> ========
> 4000-4100	network
> 4100-4200	storage
> 4200-4300	graphics
> 4300-4400	filesystem
> 4400-4500	other

I assume the last number is exclusive ;)
I can't see anything wrong. Looks good.

For the best part the naming convention is trivial, afterall, its only
really the patch order that matters - which is likely why the original
lasted so long :)

I would maybe suggest making the security patch size that little bit bigger
(hell, we have the room) and shrink linux-stable a little bit. This is
directly relating to what we spoke about a while ago re: maintaining
aging genpatches. This isn't vital though.

Cheers for that.
- John

-- 
Role:            Gentoo Linux Kernel Lead
Gentoo Linux:    http://www.gentoo.org
Public Key:      gpg --recv-keys 9C745515
Key fingerprint: A0AF F3C8 D699 A05A EC5C  24F7 95AA 241D 9C74 5515