Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-kernel
Lists: gentoo-kernel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
To: Gentoo Kernel List <gentoo-kernel@g.o>
From: Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael@g.o>
Subject: Stabilizing kernels
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:48:50 +0100

There's and interesting question: how should kernels different than
gentoo-sources and vanilla-sources be stabilized? So far I was trying to match
base kernel version + genpatches version of tuxonice-sources to gentoo-sources
(ie. when gentoo-sources-2.6.X-rY goes stable I would file a separate bug to
have tuxonice-sources-2.6.X-rZ stabilized too).

There's abug about stabilizing
few tuxonice-sources versions, but it's been quiet since a month.

My question is: should be stabilize non-core (everything other than
{gentoo,vanilla}-sources)? Opinions?

I'm more and more in favor of having tuxonice-sources and ck-sources only in ~arch.

Krzysztof Pawlik  <nelchael at>  key id: 0xF6A80E46
desktop-misc, java, apache, ppc, vim, kernel, python...

signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
Re: Stabilizing kernels
-- Peter Volkov
Lists: gentoo-kernel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
[ANNOUNCE] genpatches-2.6.34-3 release
Next by thread:
Re: Stabilizing kernels
Previous by date:
[ANNOUNCE] genpatches-2.6.34-3 release
Next by date:
Re: Stabilizing kernels

Updated Jun 23, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-kernel mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.