Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 05:48:13PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> John Mylchreest wrote:
> >Since were bunlding these whole now, should we just start naming the
> >ebuilds correctly instead?
>
> I don't think so. 2 -stable releases in the 2.6.15 cycle didn't have any
> immediate corresponding gentoo-sources bump since the patches were
> already included. The fact that we include patches alongside -stable
> means that using their notation isn't entirely accurate in our situation.
Both naming schemes have their advantages, but I see more
disadvantages with using the 2.6.x.y naming scheme in gentoo-sources
than I see advantages (primarily the reason Daniel stated above).
I suggest we keep the current naming scheme for gentoo-sources, as it
seems most correct.
Regards,
Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
|
|
