Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
John Mylchreest wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 02:19:22PM +0100, Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote:
>> Revision 347:
>> Linux 2.6.16.1 thanks to Francisco Lloret in bug #127838 (dsd)
>> Added: 1000_linux-2.6.16.1.patch
>
> Since were bunlding these whole now, should we just start naming the
> ebuilds correctly instead?
I don't think so. 2 -stable releases in the 2.6.15 cycle didn't have any
immediate corresponding gentoo-sources bump since the patches were
already included. The fact that we include patches alongside -stable
means that using their notation isn't entirely accurate in our situation.
Daniel
--
gentoo-kernel@g.o mailing list
|
|
