Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-kernel
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-kernel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-kernel@g.o
From: Peter Volkov <pva@g.o>
Subject: Re: Stabilizing kernels
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:18:50 +0400
В Срд, 23/06/2010 в 20:48 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik пишет:
> There's and interesting question: how should kernels different than
> gentoo-sources and vanilla-sources be stabilized? So far I was trying to match
> base kernel version + genpatches version of tuxonice-sources to gentoo-sources
> (ie. when gentoo-sources-2.6.X-rY goes stable I would file a separate bug to
> have tuxonice-sources-2.6.X-rZ stabilized too).
> 
> There's abug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320071 about stabilizing
> few tuxonice-sources versions, but it's been quiet since a month.
> 
> My question is: should be stabilize non-core (everything other than
> {gentoo,vanilla}-sources)? Opinions?
> 
> I'm more and more in favor of having tuxonice-sources and ck-sources only in ~arch.

For openvz-sources we have arrangement with arch teams and I mark them
stable by myself as soon as I think they are stable enough. I guess you
could do the same.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198632

-- 
Peter.



References:
Stabilizing kernels
-- Krzysztof Pawlik
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-kernel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Stabilizing kernels
Next by thread:
[ANNOUNCE] genpatches-2.6.32-14 release
Previous by date:
Stabilizing kernels
Next by date:
[ANNOUNCE] genpatches-2.6.32-14 release


Updated Jun 23, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-kernel mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.