Gentoo Archives: gentoo-kernel

From: Peter Volkov <pva@g.o>
To: gentoo-kernel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] Stabilizing kernels
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:03:43
Message-Id: 1277457530.22834.39.camel@tablet
In Reply to: [gentoo-kernel] Stabilizing kernels by Krzysztof Pawlik
1 В Срд, 23/06/2010 в 20:48 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik пишет:
2 > There's and interesting question: how should kernels different than
3 > gentoo-sources and vanilla-sources be stabilized? So far I was trying to match
4 > base kernel version + genpatches version of tuxonice-sources to gentoo-sources
5 > (ie. when gentoo-sources-2.6.X-rY goes stable I would file a separate bug to
6 > have tuxonice-sources-2.6.X-rZ stabilized too).
7 >
8 > There's abug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320071 about stabilizing
9 > few tuxonice-sources versions, but it's been quiet since a month.
10 >
11 > My question is: should be stabilize non-core (everything other than
12 > {gentoo,vanilla}-sources)? Opinions?
13 >
14 > I'm more and more in favor of having tuxonice-sources and ck-sources only in ~arch.
15
16 For openvz-sources we have arrangement with arch teams and I mark them
17 stable by myself as soon as I think they are stable enough. I guess you
18 could do the same.
19
20 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198632
21
22 --
23 Peter.