Re: [gentoo-lisp] Stabilization of last versions of sbcl and asdf on amd64

[Chema Alonso]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 02:11:05AM +0700, grozin@g.o wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Chema Alonso wrote:
> > BTW sbcl-1.1.14 is out there, I've tested it on amd64 using the ebuild
> > for 1.1.12 and it builds and runs fine. Is it ok to push it to the tree?
> Thanks, I've committed it.
>
> > WRT bugs 485630 [1] and 485632 [2], I've tested the last vesions of
> > sbcl and asdf, particularly:
> >
> > dev-lisp/sbcl-1.1.12
> > dev-lisp/asdf-3.0.2.4
> > dev-lisp/uiop-3.0.2.4
> >
> > They build and run with no problesms on amd64. All tests pass.
> >
> > As an amd64 arch tester is ok for me to stabilize them.
> >
> > Any comments/problems?
> I think it's OK to stabilize it on amd64.
>
> The bug #486552 is a major problem: nobody can compile any version of sbcl
> on x86, starting from some moment between May and August 2013, due to some
> change in something completely unrelated to sbcl. So, on x86 it definitely
> should not be stabilized.
>
> By the way, the original reporter of this bug had this problem on an amd64
> system; only after he fully updated it to ~amd64, the problem had
> disappeared. I suppose you have tested on a stable amd64, right? So, it
> seems that the problem disappeared, and stabilizing on amd64 is OK.
>
> Andrey
>

Hi,

There are problems [1] with the stabilization of =dev-lisp/asdf-3.0.2.4
on amd64.
Apparently =dev-lisp/asdf-3.0.2.4 and =dev-lisp/gentoo-init-0.1 can't
be installed at the same time due to asdf-3.0.2.4 dependencies:

DEPEND="!dev-lisp/cl-${PN}
        !dev-lisp/asdf-binary-locations
        !dev-lisp/gentoo-init
        !<dev-lisp/asdf-2.33-r3
        doc? ( virtual/texi2dvi )"

Sorry for not to test more thoroughly.

Should I rollback the stabilization?

Thanks in advance.

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485632#c2