1 |
Hello *, |
2 |
|
3 |
I've just committed gcl-2.6.10 (keyworded ~amd64 and ~x86). It compiles |
4 |
maxima on both arches, maxima tests run fine - no unexpected errors. |
5 |
|
6 |
The ebuild may have some rough edges, it's largely written from scratch. |
7 |
But I think it's OK for ~arch - it needs testing, and nobody will test it |
8 |
while it's hard-masked. So, I propose: |
9 |
|
10 |
1. In profiles/package.mask, mask only <dev-lisp/gcl-2.6.10; let 2.6.10 be |
11 |
unmasked. |
12 |
|
13 |
2. In profiles/arch/{amd64,x86}/use.mask unmask the USE flag gcl (I |
14 |
suppose I have to ask these arch teams to do it, after 1 is completed). |
15 |
|
16 |
Opinions? |
17 |
|
18 |
Andrey |