| 1 |
> May I ask you which USE flags combination(s) you tried it with, and on |
| 2 |
> which arch? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I'm on ~amd64. |
| 5 |
dev-scheme/racket-5.1 was built with the following: |
| 6 |
USE="X cairo foreign (multilib) opengl -backtrace -cgc -doc -futures |
| 7 |
-places -plain -profile -sgc -slatex -static" |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The only other suggestion I'd offer is regarding the backtrace, |
| 10 |
futures, and places flags. At least on 5.0.2, one or more of these |
| 11 |
cause the build to hang forever at 100% CPU. Only when I finally gave |
| 12 |
up and killed the build did I notice the ewarn that these flags can |
| 13 |
cause that. I realize there's only so much we can protect people from |
| 14 |
themselves, but it would have been nice if it made me acknowledge that |
| 15 |
I intended to use a risky flag. Ideally, we'd just fix whatever |
| 16 |
causes it to hang, but that's an upstream issue - could we maybe just |
| 17 |
mask those flags? Although, I haven't tested them on 5.1 yet to see |
| 18 |
if they're even still a problem... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Cyprien, I'd be happy to help test with other configurations. Thanks |
| 21 |
for your work. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-Neil |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Cyprien Nicolas <c.nicolas@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 26 |
> On 21/02/11 18:07, Morgon Kanter wrote: |
| 27 |
>> Hey folks, |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> I noticed there wasn't yet an ebuild for the new version of Racket, so |
| 30 |
>> I went ahead and made one. It's attached. |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> A couple changes besides just bumping the version number: |
| 33 |
>> * Doesn't really seem like that makefile patch was required anymore (I |
| 34 |
>> didn't need it), so I commented that out. |
| 35 |
>> * The new Racket GUI system doesn't appear to include any of those |
| 36 |
>> external libraries that the ebuild used to issue an "rm" for, so I |
| 37 |
>> removed those bits from the ebuild (as well as the formerly |
| 38 |
>> commented-out rm commands that were replaced by something different). |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
>> That's it for the changes, aside from a version bump. |
| 41 |
>> |
| 42 |
>> Thanks, |
| 43 |
>> -- Morgon |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> Actually, there is a work-in-progress ebuild, but I didn't had the time |
| 46 |
> to test it intensively, especially with the cgc and sgc garbage |
| 47 |
> collectors, and the plain USE flags (as the makefile patch is related to |
| 48 |
> those USEs), and I just it an "emake failed" with USE=plain. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> Apart from some cosmetic changes (EAPI4, REAUIRED_USE="cgc? ( !sgc )", |
| 51 |
> some spacing) my ebuild is the same :) |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> May I ask you which USE flags combination(s) you tried it with, and on |
| 54 |
> which arch? (applies for Neil too). |
| 55 |
> Thanks for the feedback |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
> Regards |
| 58 |
> |
| 59 |
> ,Cyprien |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
> |
Archives