1 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
6 |
>> fine with SBCL and I think OpenMCL. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> That should be SBCL and CLisp :) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Marijn |
11 |
> |
12 |
> - -- |
13 |
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project |
14 |
> <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
15 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
16 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
17 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
18 |
> |
19 |
> iD8DBQFHBlYdp/VmCx0OL2wRAtnwAKC+mgevD2sKiDoJZ6We571zScIXxACggfJT |
20 |
> TxDTPFVfOfqKOVOvrYayiJM= |
21 |
> =C3LO |
22 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
23 |
|
24 |
Do you know anyone on the Axiom, FriCAS, OpenAxiom or Sage lists? I'm on |
25 |
all of them, and they're "Lisp-dependent". Briefly, there have been some |
26 |
flamewars and two Axiom developers got upset enough to fork off FriCAS |
27 |
and OpenAxiom. Where Sage fits into the picture is that they picked up |
28 |
FriCAS. The last I looked (yesterday) FriCAS was building with Clisp |
29 |
including all the X windows stuff. I'm not sure but I think they can |
30 |
build with SBCL too, but prefer Clisp because Cygwin carries it, giving |
31 |
them a working GUI CAS on a Windows box. |
32 |
|
33 |
I haven't seen much from OpenAxiom or Sage recently, but the original |
34 |
Axiom is still carrying its own GCL source, which doesn't always work |
35 |
(like on AMD64 for 2.6.8pre, for example). For that matter, Axiom and |
36 |
its forks also depend on a more recent "noweb" than what's in Gentoo, |
37 |
and carry their own source of that too. |
38 |
|
39 |
So I'd say Gentoo is probably safe with both SBCL and Clisp. Is CMUCL as |
40 |
dead as I think it is? It's still masked on AMD64, right? |
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-lisp@g.o mailing list |