| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hi Imran, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On 04/12/11 04:43, Imran Rafique wrote: |
| 7 |
> Gentoo-lispers, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Currently, vim support for embedded racket is disabled in |
| 10 |
> eclass/vim.eclass. I have patched this in my local overlay to add |
| 11 |
> support for both racket (and tcl). As dev-scheme/racket is itself not |
| 12 |
> part of the standard portage tree, I thought it might not make sense |
| 13 |
> to create a new bug to amend the standard vim.eclass. Would it be |
| 14 |
> better to just add the amended vim.eclass to the gentoo-lisp overlay |
| 15 |
> instead? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Racket is on its way to main tree. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> If so, then should I just send the patch to this list, or create a |
| 20 |
> bugzilla bug with some gentoo-lisp specific info? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
You can create a bug and have it depend on the bug about getting racket |
| 23 |
in main tree (324161). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Marijn |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk2kDiQACgkQp/VmCx0OL2zQGgCgnL2JgCNjURprwWXP/FnjU7GO |
| 31 |
FgoAn08AiN0VVgnjnYVwcP/4mXlxxxqf |
| 32 |
=fNOW |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives