Gentoo Archives: gentoo-mips

From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-mips@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] Please test SGI mips stages
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:12:02
Message-Id: BANLkTinvBF=6O=U9wCuSWd1yoUZbB2fr5Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-mips] Please test SGI mips stages by Matt Turner
1 On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Manuel Lauss
3 > <manuel.lauss@××××××××××.com> wrote:
4 >> Hi Matt,
5 >>
6 >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote:
7 >>> If you'd like to help offset the cost of electricity used to create
8 >>> these and future stages, please send me a private email. :)
9 >>
10 >> First of all, thanks for fixing Gentoo on MIPS
11 >>
12 >> What kind of machines are you looking for?  I suspect you're aiming for
13 >> the bigger 64bit machines (SiByte, SGI) ?
14 >> I'd like to help and I routinely (re)build Gentoo on little-endian MIPS32
15 >> machines (o32 ABI); but I don't have any 64bit machines.
16 >
17 > Great. Thanks :)
18 >
19 > I plan to build mips32 stages, but I don't really know much about this
20 > type of hardware. As you guessed, I'm more interested in 64-bit
21 > systems.
22 >
23 > Are there big-endian mips32 systems worth supporting? My little-endian
24 > userland seems to be dead and I've been building these big endian
25 > stages, so I haven't had time to revive it yet.
26
27 I think almost every little broadcom/atheros-based router supported
28 by OpenWRT is a potential candidate; they certainly outnumber the
29 available big SGI boxes :) I don't know which endianness though,
30 but being networking machines I suppose them being big-endian
31 makes sense.
32
33 My test hardware is bi-endian, but I never ran it big-endian since I've
34 no kernel for them. Let me just try and figure out what's necessary..
35
36
37 > If you would, please join the #gentoo-mips IRC channel. :)
38
39 Done.
40
41 Thanks,
42 Manuel Lauss