| 1 |
My logs seem to be fine. Though there is a litte oddness to them, being that they report the date |
| 2 |
and time twice, they're not doing the same thing yours are. Though I am using the version of rsyncd |
| 3 |
that is marked stable in portage, and you aren't. tsk, tsk. ;) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Rob |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
2004/10/10 04:48:05 [26097] 2004/10/10 04:48:05 ?.?.?.? gentoo-portage metadata/timestamp.chk 70 |
| 8 |
2004/10/10 04:48:06 [26097] wrote 483 bytes read 226 bytes total size 32 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Tobias Klausmann wrote: |
| 11 |
> Hi! |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Today I noticed something strange in my rsync log: the timestamps |
| 14 |
> seemd out-of-order. By exactly two hours. So I hacked thes rsync |
| 15 |
> source to include the time zone in the timestamps. And lo and |
| 16 |
> behold, they are severely fscked (lines truncated for easier reading): |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> 2004/10/13 11:06:06-CEST [8470] rsyncd version 2.6.3 starting, ... |
| 19 |
> 2004/10/13 11:06:16-CEST [8473] rsync on gentoo-portage//metada... |
| 20 |
> 2004/10/13 09:06:16-UTC [8473] wrote 501 bytes read 192 bytes ... |
| 21 |
> 2004/10/13 11:06:17-CEST [8474] rsync on gentoo-portage// ... |
| 22 |
> 2004/10/13 09:06:23-UTC [8474] wrote 2307005 bytes read ... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Why is this? As far as I can tell, both the wrote... line and the |
| 25 |
> rsync on... line use the same logging functions. Could someone |
| 26 |
> take a peek at their logfiles and tell me if I'm the only one |
| 27 |
> with this problem? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Greets, |
| 30 |
> Tobias |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-mirrors@g.o mailing list |
Archives