| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jeffrey Forman wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 23:45 +0100, Michael Renner wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Send it to the mirror contact. The mailing list should be kept |
| 7 |
> > "noise-free". I (and most likely other mirror-admins too) don't care |
| 8 |
> > when mirror $foo is broken. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That's one side of the response that I can totally relate to. We'll see |
| 11 |
> how the rest of the admins think about this, and I'll go with majority |
| 12 |
> rules. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> /me scribbles down Michael as a "dont bother me unless I screw up" ;) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Same here. If you bother the list with it, people will start |
| 17 |
throwing it away without looking at it - purpose defeated. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> > Send it when the mirror goes "bad" and from that one once per day. As |
| 20 |
> > soon as the server gets "ok" again, reset the one-day-delay, so that |
| 21 |
> > "flapping" problems can get spotted. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> The flapping is something I thought about, but the hamsters in my head |
| 24 |
> kept burning out when I tried to think of a simple solution to keeping |
| 25 |
> track of it. Then again I hope with this script, I will be much more |
| 26 |
> on-top of removing mirrors that have gone by the way side. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
The flap detection is non trivial, surely. You might want to look |
| 29 |
at the Nagios docs as for how flapping is defined there. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
Tobias |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
You don't need eyes to see, you need vision. |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-mirrors@g.o mailing list |
Archives