Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-mirrors
My logs seem to be fine. Though there is a litte oddness to them, being that they report the date
and time twice, they're not doing the same thing yours are. Though I am using the version of rsyncd
that is marked stable in portage, and you aren't. tsk, tsk. ;)
Rob
2004/10/10 04:48:05 [26097] 2004/10/10 04:48:05 ?.?.?.? gentoo-portage metadata/timestamp.chk 70
2004/10/10 04:48:06 [26097] wrote 483 bytes read 226 bytes total size 32
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Today I noticed something strange in my rsync log: the timestamps
> seemd out-of-order. By exactly two hours. So I hacked thes rsync
> source to include the time zone in the timestamps. And lo and
> behold, they are severely fscked (lines truncated for easier reading):
>
> 2004/10/13 11:06:06-CEST [8470] rsyncd version 2.6.3 starting, ...
> 2004/10/13 11:06:16-CEST [8473] rsync on gentoo-portage//metada...
> 2004/10/13 09:06:16-UTC [8473] wrote 501 bytes read 192 bytes ...
> 2004/10/13 11:06:17-CEST [8474] rsync on gentoo-portage// ...
> 2004/10/13 09:06:23-UTC [8474] wrote 2307005 bytes read ...
>
> Why is this? As far as I can tell, both the wrote... line and the
> rsync on... line use the same logging functions. Could someone
> take a peek at their logfiles and tell me if I'm the only one
> with this problem?
>
> Greets,
> Tobias
>
--
gentoo-mirrors@g.o mailing list
|
|