List Archive: gentoo-mirrors
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
My logs seem to be fine. Though there is a litte oddness to them, being that they report the date
and time twice, they're not doing the same thing yours are. Though I am using the version of rsyncd
that is marked stable in portage, and you aren't. tsk, tsk. ;)
2004/10/10 04:48:05  2004/10/10 04:48:05 ?.?.?.? gentoo-portage metadata/timestamp.chk 70
2004/10/10 04:48:06  wrote 483 bytes read 226 bytes total size 32
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Today I noticed something strange in my rsync log: the timestamps
> seemd out-of-order. By exactly two hours. So I hacked thes rsync
> source to include the time zone in the timestamps. And lo and
> behold, they are severely fscked (lines truncated for easier reading):
> 2004/10/13 11:06:06-CEST  rsyncd version 2.6.3 starting, ...
> 2004/10/13 11:06:16-CEST  rsync on gentoo-portage//metada...
> 2004/10/13 09:06:16-UTC  wrote 501 bytes read 192 bytes ...
> 2004/10/13 11:06:17-CEST  rsync on gentoo-portage// ...
> 2004/10/13 09:06:23-UTC  wrote 2307005 bytes read ...
> Why is this? As far as I can tell, both the wrote... line and the
> rsync on... line use the same logging functions. Could someone
> take a peek at their logfiles and tell me if I'm the only one
> with this problem?
email@example.com mailing list