Gentoo Archives: gentoo-mirrors

From: burn <burn@××××××.ca>
To: gentoo-mirrors@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-mirrors] Gentoo rsync mirror alert RFC
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:41:58
Message-Id: 43F2F750.8050702@gentoo.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-mirrors] Gentoo rsync mirror alert RFC by Jeffrey Forman
1 Once, maybe twice a day to the admin responsible for that mirror seems
2 fine to me. It doesn't look like you're hurting for rsync mirrors,
3 personally I'd just toast any that have no admin contact information. Of
4 the 13 with no email specified, 8 of them either have no timestamp or no
5 response, so you'd lose 5 total. Then again, I like to cover my own ass.
6 ;)
7 You could also script it up so that it instead of keeping track of the
8 down notices including flapping, etc, it just accumulates a certain
9 number, say after 5 attempts (depending on how often it's run) and no
10 result, it fires off an email.
11
12 burn
13
14 Jeffrey Forman wrote:
15 > On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 23:45 +0100, Michael Renner wrote:
16 >
17 >> Send it to the mirror contact. The mailing list should be kept
18 >> "noise-free". I (and most likely other mirror-admins too) don't care
19 >> when mirror $foo is broken.
20 >>
21 >
22 > That's one side of the response that I can totally relate to. We'll see
23 > how the rest of the admins think about this, and I'll go with majority
24 > rules.
25 >
26 > /me scribbles down Michael as a "dont bother me unless I screw up" ;)
27 >
28 >
29 >> Send it when the mirror goes "bad" and from that one once per day. As
30 >> soon as the server gets "ok" again, reset the one-day-delay, so that
31 >> "flapping" problems can get spotted.
32 >>
33 >
34 > The flapping is something I thought about, but the hamsters in my head
35 > kept burning out when I tried to think of a simple solution to keeping
36 > track of it. Then again I hope with this script, I will be much more
37 > on-top of removing mirrors that have gone by the way side.
38 >
39 > -Jeffrey
40 >
41 >
42 >
43 --
44 gentoo-mirrors@g.o mailing list