Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] nominations
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:25:11
Message-Id: 1233869110.4018.2@spike
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] nominations by Richard Freeman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2009.02.05 18:44, Richard Freeman wrote:
> Lukasz Damentko wrote: > > > > "No individual shall serve as a Gentoo Foundation Trustee and > Gentoo > > Council Member concurrently " > >
[snip stuff I agree with]
> > I think that this bylaw is counterproductive, but that's a different > topic... :) >
Richard, The rule prevents the Foundation being a subset of the council and preseves the split that was intended when the Foundation was established. Maybe the split wasn't a good idea in the first place? Its certainly an odd management structure that Gentoo has. It also prevents a huge hole being left in the gentoo management structure by the loss of a single individual. - -- Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmLWTYACgkQTE4/y7nJvav0nwCgwAmkfH8gfZn/LVA6eIyWZgW4 +gUAn26zAFTG++BHUQuhAc6xwGfxbE0Z =911L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] nominations Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>