Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] nominations
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:25:11
Message-Id: 1233869110.4018.2@spike
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] nominations by Richard Freeman
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 2009.02.05 18:44, Richard Freeman wrote:
5 > Lukasz Damentko wrote:
6 > >
7 > > "No individual shall serve as a Gentoo Foundation Trustee and
8 > Gentoo
9 > > Council Member concurrently "
10 > >
11 [snip stuff I agree with]
12 >
13 > I think that this bylaw is counterproductive, but that's a different
14 > topic... :)
15 >
16 Richard,
17
18 The rule prevents the Foundation being a subset of the council and
19 preseves the split that was intended when the Foundation was
20 established. Maybe the split wasn't a good idea in the first place?
21 Its certainly an odd management structure that Gentoo has.
22
23 It also prevents a huge hole being left in the gentoo management
24 structure by the loss of a single individual.
25
26 - --
27 Regards,
28
29 Roy Bamford
30 (NeddySeagoon) a member of
31 gentoo-ops
32 forum-mods
33 treecleaners
34 trustees
35 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
37
38 iEYEARECAAYFAkmLWTYACgkQTE4/y7nJvav0nwCgwAmkfH8gfZn/LVA6eIyWZgW4
39 +gUAn26zAFTG++BHUQuhAc6xwGfxbE0Z
40 =911L
41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] nominations Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>