Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Thoughts on upcoming trustee elections
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:05:52
Message-Id: 426FFE7C.4020301@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Thoughts on upcoming trustee elections by Grant Goodyear
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grant Goodyear wrote:
> As for the idea of having two-year terms, I tend to think that our > turnover is just too high for that. It's rare for devs to be active for > two years, and a two-year term essentially requires that they be active > for three years (with the first year required for foundation > membership).
How about this. We have the first election, but the half with the most votes get 18-month terms -- just this once! That will set up a six-month staggering of re-elections for half the seats each time, with standard 1-year terms after that. If that's too often, there are alternate possibilities, like doing the same thing at 12 and 18 months, or 9 and 12, etc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCb/58XVaO67S1rtsRAs+MAJ9L3pu8gaQHfwT+aHYG3EMBcqVCfgCgnMlz R+xdCA/MR6dlNTPdaMKX76k= =cXei -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Thoughts on upcoming trustee elections Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>