| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 5 |
> As for the idea of having two-year terms, I tend to think that our |
| 6 |
> turnover is just too high for that. It's rare for devs to be active for |
| 7 |
> two years, and a two-year term essentially requires that they be active |
| 8 |
> for three years (with the first year required for foundation |
| 9 |
> membership). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
How about this. We have the first election, but the half with the most |
| 12 |
votes get 18-month terms -- just this once! That will set up a six-month |
| 13 |
staggering of re-elections for half the seats each time, with standard |
| 14 |
1-year terms after that. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If that's too often, there are alternate possibilities, like doing the |
| 17 |
same thing at 12 and 18 months, or 9 and 12, etc. |
| 18 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 19 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 20 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
iD8DBQFCb/58XVaO67S1rtsRAs+MAJ9L3pu8gaQHfwT+aHYG3EMBcqVCfgCgnMlz |
| 23 |
R+xdCA/MR6dlNTPdaMKX76k= |
| 24 |
=cXei |
| 25 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list |
Archives