Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Eligible ex-devs
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 07:12:57
Message-Id: 452601F2.9010209@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Eligible ex-devs by Danny van Dyk
1 Danny van Dyk wrote:
2 > Hi All,
3 >
4 >> Seems we need some clarification of which ex-devs are eligible to
5 >> vote in this trustee election.
6 >>
7 >> I thought it was anyone who has been a dev for a year or more up
8 >> until today.
9 >>
10 >> Danny (kugelfang) disagrees, but I'm not sure I can explain what he
11 >> said, so I'll let him.
12 >
13 > * Only Foundation members may vote
14 >
15 > * You become a Foundation member only by
16 > - Being a Gentoo Developer for _at least_ a year before the election
17 > period starts.
18 > _and_
19 > - Participating in the voting process.
20 >
21 > This is defined here[1], quoting:
22 > "Each Gentoo Developer that has been an active developer for at least
23 > one year at the moment the voting period starts is able to rank all
24 > candidates in the preferred order of election. Multiple entries for the
25 > same position are allowed."
26 >
27 > Some samples:
28 >
29 > a) Both ferringb and ciaranm are eligible to vote: They both
30 > participated in the last (foundation) election (IMHO) and their
31 > status as foundation members never ceased. Membership termination
32 > can only be voluntarily or by 2/3 majority during the annual meeting
33 > or any special meeting as specified by the Bylaws.
34 >
35 > b) Tsunam is not eligible to vote, as he joined gentoo only 0.85 years
36 > ago. (Just a sample as we discussed it on IRC)
37 >
38 > c) Joe Developer was active until 2 weeks ago. He did _not_ vote in the
39 > last (foundation) election. Thus, he never became a foundation member
40 > and can't become one in this election. He's not eligible to vote.
41 >
42 > Besides: The current election, as it is our implementation of
43 > the "Annual Meeting" as specified by the Bylaws, will beinvalid, as all
44 > Foundation members must have notice[2] "... not less than ten(10) days
45 > [...] before the date of the meeting. ...". As we're still collecting
46 > all eligible voters we can be sure that not all foundation members have
47 > received such notice.
48 >
49 > In short: We need a secretary to do this properly. We need to keep track
50 > who voted when, and we need to send out notice in time. As this is an
51 > annual duty only, I'd like to suggest to hire a lawyer who does all
52 > this, in the foundation's name, once a year. As all notice can go out
53 > electronically, there is not so much financial overhead here.
54
55 Agreed. But be aware that the bylaws have not been approved by any (not
56 even the board of trustees). I think that we should still follow the
57 bylaws and consider them accepted by default (no opposition).
58
59 It should be clear that only members can vote and that a special rule
60 was constituted (and not retracted later) to allow eligible members to
61 become member by voting. All developers that have been active for more
62 than 1 year are eligible.
63
64 As it currently stands no-one has canceled his membership so everyone
65 who once became a member (by voting or by being trustee) is eligible to
66 vote.
67
68 Paul
69 --
70 gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Eligible ex-devs Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>