1 |
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Chrissy Fullam <musikc@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> I wanted to add two things to my previous email |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Refer to bylaws that were approved in today's Trustee meeting: |
5 |
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~neddyseagoon/docs/FoundationBylawsProposed_7.xml |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> I cannot understand why a person cannot be on the Council and on the |
8 |
>> Trustees? We had someone do so in the past and no conflicts or issues |
9 |
>> arose. What is the reasoning that a person cannot serve on the |
10 |
>> technical team and the legal team? |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Please note: that I do not see validity in the statement 'what if |
13 |
>> Council asks for money and dual role person on the Trustee approves |
14 |
>> it' as I think that person would hold the same opinion regardless of |
15 |
>> being on both teams unless we are saying that we cannot trust our |
16 |
>> Council people to not make decisions in the best interest of Gentoo. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> ======================================== |
19 |
> <addition> |
20 |
> From the Gentoo Foundation Charter page: |
21 |
> "... the Gentoo project needs a framework for intellectual property |
22 |
> protection and financial contributions while limiting the contributors' |
23 |
> legal exposure. The Gentoo Foundation will embody this framework without |
24 |
> intervening in the Gentoo development." |
25 |
> |
26 |
> If the Trustees are not supposed to intervene in Gentoo development, that |
27 |
> being the technical direction of Gentoo, aren't they are in direct violation |
28 |
> of this by determining who cannot be a Council member by their own |
29 |
> membership? |
30 |
|
31 |
If the Council are not supposed to intervene in the legal and |
32 |
financial direction of Gentoo, aren't they in direct violation of this |
33 |
by being having councilmembers who are also trustees? |
34 |
|
35 |
I think this particular argument is two sided ;p |
36 |
|
37 |
> |
38 |
> ======================================== |
39 |
> <second addition> |
40 |
> Fmccor voted today that there should be a separation of Trustees and |
41 |
> Council. I see a direct conflict in how he was a Trustee and ran for |
42 |
> Council, but after not being elected he has now decided that no one else can |
43 |
> do it either? He accepted his own Council nomination on 2008-06-05 and |
44 |
> responded to a series of 'questions to our nominees' on the same date. |
45 |
> From his own email response: |
46 |
>> > 4. How do you think the council and trustees can work together to |
47 |
>> > make Gentoo better? |
48 |
>> I'm already a trustee, so having a council member who is a trustee is |
49 |
>> a start. |
50 |
|
51 |
I'm confused by your statement; are you trying to argue that the |
52 |
council and trustees could work together better if they shared |
53 |
members? |
54 |
|
55 |
I would support that argument if it was clear that they are not |
56 |
working well together right now and sharing members would offer |
57 |
improvmeent at the cost of the other inherit risks; but I have no data |
58 |
on that so I am unsure if sharing members is strictly necessary at |
59 |
this point. |