Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: Chrissy Fullam <musikc@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@l.g.o>, gentoo-council <gentoo-council@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-nfp] Re: [gentoo-council] Foundation by laws: new Article V
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:51:43
Message-Id: b41005390808311651y31222713kbcddf50805c14310@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] RE: [gentoo-council] Foundation by laws: new Article V by Chrissy Fullam
1 On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Chrissy Fullam <musikc@g.o> wrote:
2 > I wanted to add two things to my previous email
3 >
4 >> Refer to bylaws that were approved in today's Trustee meeting:
5 >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~neddyseagoon/docs/FoundationBylawsProposed_7.xml
6 >
7 >> I cannot understand why a person cannot be on the Council and on the
8 >> Trustees? We had someone do so in the past and no conflicts or issues
9 >> arose. What is the reasoning that a person cannot serve on the
10 >> technical team and the legal team?
11 >>
12 >> Please note: that I do not see validity in the statement 'what if
13 >> Council asks for money and dual role person on the Trustee approves
14 >> it' as I think that person would hold the same opinion regardless of
15 >> being on both teams unless we are saying that we cannot trust our
16 >> Council people to not make decisions in the best interest of Gentoo.
17 >
18 > ========================================
19 > <addition>
20 > From the Gentoo Foundation Charter page:
21 > "... the Gentoo project needs a framework for intellectual property
22 > protection and financial contributions while limiting the contributors'
23 > legal exposure. The Gentoo Foundation will embody this framework without
24 > intervening in the Gentoo development."
25 >
26 > If the Trustees are not supposed to intervene in Gentoo development, that
27 > being the technical direction of Gentoo, aren't they are in direct violation
28 > of this by determining who cannot be a Council member by their own
29 > membership?
30
31 If the Council are not supposed to intervene in the legal and
32 financial direction of Gentoo, aren't they in direct violation of this
33 by being having councilmembers who are also trustees?
34
35 I think this particular argument is two sided ;p
36
37 >
38 > ========================================
39 > <second addition>
40 > Fmccor voted today that there should be a separation of Trustees and
41 > Council. I see a direct conflict in how he was a Trustee and ran for
42 > Council, but after not being elected he has now decided that no one else can
43 > do it either? He accepted his own Council nomination on 2008-06-05 and
44 > responded to a series of 'questions to our nominees' on the same date.
45 > From his own email response:
46 >> > 4. How do you think the council and trustees can work together to
47 >> > make Gentoo better?
48 >> I'm already a trustee, so having a council member who is a trustee is
49 >> a start.
50
51 I'm confused by your statement; are you trying to argue that the
52 council and trustees could work together better if they shared
53 members?
54
55 I would support that argument if it was clear that they are not
56 working well together right now and sharing members would offer
57 improvmeent at the cost of the other inherit risks; but I have no data
58 on that so I am unsure if sharing members is strictly necessary at
59 this point.