Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>
To: gentoo-core@l.g.o, gentoo-nfp@l.g.o, gentoo-trustees@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-nfp] Re: [gentoo-core] Upcoming elections
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:27:28
Message-Id: 20050411102954.GA11299@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] Upcoming elections by Grant Goodyear
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:33:42PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> 1. Members must be currently active Gentoo developers who have been > developers for at least a year. > 2. Members must have requested membership. If you don't want to be > a member of the foundation, you shouldn't have to be. (Indeed, the > actual role of the foundation is quite limited.)
I agree with this proposal, with the addendum that membership should be rerequested each year. It gives more work but keeps the membership list clean over the years with people interested in the bureaucracy of dealing with IP, funding requests and dealing with Social Contract complaints. Personally I think that, without this reoccurring request, we'll soon have discussions on development-matters and it'll be difficult to keep them out. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen -- Documentation project leader The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>>

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-nfp] Re: [gentoo-core] Upcoming elections Spider <spider@g.o>