1 |
Hi guys, |
2 |
|
3 |
Here is a very short summary of the NFP progress so far: |
4 |
|
5 |
1) I have committed to get something going by the end of this month (April.) |
6 |
This would be either an establishment of an NFP, or some kind of action plan |
7 |
to set up multiple entities like a NFP with one or more cooperatives to |
8 |
provide funding. |
9 |
|
10 |
2) The main issue of concern for me is (obviously) not getting the NFP set |
11 |
up as soon as humanly possible but making sure that whatever is really best |
12 |
for the Gentoo community, as it is very hard to change things once things |
13 |
have been established. |
14 |
|
15 |
This has been very difficult because I have been trying to meet many |
16 |
conflicting and contradictory expectations of users and developers: |
17 |
|
18 |
A) Expectation: Gentoo will be competitive against Microsoft |
19 |
Reality: Microsoft spends $6.8 Billion USD on R&D every year. Free |
20 |
software |
21 |
is lacking its own internal economic ecosystem, let alone a |
22 |
significant R&D |
23 |
budget. Realistically, Gentoo can do well for HPC (high-peformance |
24 |
computing,) |
25 |
clusters, maybe some grid computing, servers, and somewhat for |
26 |
embedded. |
27 |
It's not viable on the desktop, nor is any other Linux distro (this |
28 |
is a |
29 |
systemic problem of the Linux community, and not the fault of KDE or |
30 |
GNOME. |
31 |
If you don't see why this is so, just please trust me on this that |
32 |
this will |
33 |
be true for at least the next year.) |
34 |
|
35 |
B) Expectation: I want to be able to work on Gentoo full-time. |
36 |
Reality: As time goes on, Linux and free software is getting |
37 |
supported more |
38 |
and more by large corporations and universities. The economic model |
39 |
driving |
40 |
free software development is not in favor of the establishment of |
41 |
small |
42 |
businesses and self-sufficient local developer communities. This |
43 |
means as the current economic model plays out, it is more and more likely |
44 |
that people working |
45 |
full-time on free software will be employed by big companies and |
46 |
higher education. |
47 |
This is not a model that gives developers the kind of independence |
48 |
that they may be |
49 |
used to from working in their spare time from home. |
50 |
|
51 |
"Well why can't we just take money from companies that give it to |
52 |
us?" |
53 |
|
54 |
Good question. These big companies will want some return on their |
55 |
dollar, so they |
56 |
will expect you to do what *they* want and not what you want. Also |
57 |
see item E) which |
58 |
explains why this fact prevents us from taking 501(c)(3) status |
59 |
without risking |
60 |
revocation of that status by the IRS. |
61 |
|
62 |
C) Expectation: Gentoo should be representative of user needs. |
63 |
Reality: Having an open participatory model makes it easier for |
64 |
external entities |
65 |
(such as the dreaded Microsoft) to co-opt (ie take over) the entity. |
66 |
|
67 |
D) Expectation: Gentoo should be set up to protect against co-option. |
68 |
Reality: This requires a closed and non-participatory model in order |
69 |
to implement, |
70 |
which is contrary to the nature of having an fair and accountable |
71 |
open |
72 |
participatory model. This kind of system will tend to run much more |
73 |
like a |
74 |
dictatorship, and elections will not be held as elections always |
75 |
allow for |
76 |
co-options to take place. |
77 |
|
78 |
And how does one get the benefits of C *and* D at the same time? It requires |
79 |
*tons* of planning and complex regulations. In other words, in an attempt to |
80 |
get both C and D at the same time, we will end up with a very complex |
81 |
bureaucratic system that takes a very long time to design. |
82 |
|
83 |
E) Expectation: We should have 501(c)(3) status |
84 |
Reality: I have learned that 501(c)(3) status is for charities. It |
85 |
is very popular |
86 |
to apply for this status in the US, as it allows donations to Gentoo |
87 |
to be tax |
88 |
deductible. However, it is not the appropriate classification for |
89 |
Gentoo. If anyone |
90 |
gives money to Gentoo and derives some material benefit from it (ie |
91 |
we do work |
92 |
that benefits their company or themselves in some way,) the IRS is |
93 |
able |
94 |
to revoke our tax-exempt status and the 501(c)(3) entity is then |
95 |
immediately |
96 |
responsible to pay all back taxes that would have been collected. |
97 |
This would |
98 |
generally cause the not-for-profit to have to cease operations. I |
99 |
have learned |
100 |
that we should be classified as a not-for-profit trade association |
101 |
(501(c)(4)) |
102 |
or NFP support organization. Otherwise the NFP will be a very |
103 |
susceptible to |
104 |
being shut down by the IRS. The rule here is that just because |
105 |
others have applied |
106 |
for 501(c)(3) status doesn't mean that they have made the right |
107 |
decision and we |
108 |
should follow their (erroneous) lead. It has taken me maybe 6 months |
109 |
to be convinced |
110 |
by my lawyer and others that 501(c)(3) status is *not* the right |
111 |
classification |
112 |
in the US code for our future organization, and this has also |
113 |
significantly |
114 |
impeded NFP progress. Again, it is the struggle of trying to find |
115 |
some possible |
116 |
way to meet all developer expectations. |
117 |
|
118 |
3) Several major universities are in negotiation about setting up some kind |
119 |
of entity to fund Gentoo development, and I am participating in some of |
120 |
these discussions. |
121 |
|
122 |
Based on this, my current plan was to set up a couple of not-for-profit |
123 |
cooperatives, one for universities and another for gentoo users, that allows |
124 |
them to pool their resources to help fund Gentoo development. |
125 |
|
126 |
Several developers like the idea of the coop but wanted Gentoo to have its |
127 |
own NFP entity separate from the cooperatives. I am perfectly willing to do |
128 |
this -- just set up the NFP entity alone, and then set up the cooperatives |
129 |
or leave the NFP to figure out how to fund itself if you want. |
130 |
|
131 |
It certainly makes my job easier, and my desire was for the coop to be a |
132 |
"good thing" for gentoo developers and I was trying to ensure its success by |
133 |
setting up funding for the entity ahead of time. If you don't want it, I |
134 |
won't do it. |
135 |
|
136 |
Just please understand that NFP status in itself doesn't address any larger |
137 |
long-term sustainability or software quality or "how do I work on gentoo |
138 |
full-time" concerns. Thus, NFP status in itself does not necessarily help |
139 |
Gentoo become a long-term success on the desktop or allow Gentoo to be |
140 |
competitive long-term with Microsoft. Setting up a NFP does not help you |
141 |
resolve the problem of how you will be able to work on Gentoo full-time and |
142 |
quit your miserable day job. This is because just setting up an NFP doesn't |
143 |
create any ties of accountability between the software users and developers, |
144 |
nor does it necessarily create a healthy or sustainable software |
145 |
economy/ecosystem that allows our developers and projects to be funded. |
146 |
|
147 |
It doesn't ensure that the board of directors is accountable to your needs. |
148 |
It doesn't ensure that the NFP will not be co-opted, and it does not ensure |
149 |
that some company will not be able to make lots of money from your work on |
150 |
Gentoo without compensating you (your work could always be rewritten under a |
151 |
non-GPL license, or included as-is in some piece of commercial software that |
152 |
someone makes millions from due to having lots of marketing resources that |
153 |
you don't.) |
154 |
|
155 |
You will need to choose between an "open, participatory" (and co-optable) |
156 |
and a "closed, non-co-optable" (and non-representative/unfair) governing |
157 |
model. So let me know which you prefer and I'll get it set up. The other |
158 |
alternative is to try to find some kind of compromise, where the government |
159 |
for the not-for-profit isn't too fair or open, but is more bureaucratic and |
160 |
harder to co-opt. Let me know which one appeals to you. |
161 |
|
162 |
Sincerely, |
163 |
|
164 |
Daniel |
165 |
|
166 |
|
167 |
|
168 |
-- |
169 |
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list |