Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 2.2 Other States
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:04:37
Message-Id: 1208891073.2579.0@spike
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] Section 2.2 Other States by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 2008.04.22 00:10, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
5 > I think for now we can drop this. Unless we want to expand to other
6 > countries? I think countries makes more sense than another state of
7 > the US. Unless states is the proper legal term there, not implying a
8 > state of the US.
9
10 [snip]
11
12 > --
13 > William L. Thomson Jr.
14 > amd64/Java/Trustees
15 > Gentoo Foundation
16 >
17 >
18
19 Other countries have other laws and different ways of doing things.
20 If we expand to other countries, it will be under their laws, not New
21 Mexicos'. This has to be a US states thing.
22
23 - --
24 Regards,
25
26 Roy Bamford
27 (NeddySeagoon) a member of
28 gentoo-ops
29 forum-mods
30 treecleaners
31 trustees
32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
34
35 iEYEARECAAYFAkgONsEACgkQTE4/y7nJvas9pwCeKTnpVB+CY17KkJ2bbSXl1630
36 sR0AnRSoujqGQTNJZ9HMLrJfRaEs5AYY
37 =bRXo
38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
39
40 --
41 gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 2.2 Other States "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>