Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Fw: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:14:29
Message-Id: 20080822151415.04001d96@vrm378-02
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Fw: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation by Roy Bamford
Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote:
> I don't see any of this addressing distribution of a binary patch, > which is fairly reasonable, as it tries to make it as legally > difficult to create one as possible, so the possibility of > distrubution does not occur. > > Adobe must know the patch exists. Since the above does not appear to > address the distrubution of a patch that is not supposed to exist, > has anyone asked Adobe about distrubution of the patch ?
The good news is that this is no longer an issue. The next version is promised to work with libcurl.so.4 and fallback to libcurl.so.3 if necessary. [1] Thanks for the input! [1] http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2008/08/curl_tradeoffs.html -- Jim Ramsay Gentoo Developer (rox/fluxbox/gkrellm)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature