Re: [gentoo-nfp] Foundation membership, take 2

[Deedra Waters]

I think that  devs, or members should be a dev for a min of at least 6
months before they are allowed to vote. I say this because we've had
some people who have become new devs only to become inactive after a
month or to, or to leave after a couple of months for 1 reason or
another. I remember someone asking in the earlier thread to this  how we
could see how long someone has been a dev. One answer to this would be
to check the new dev bug for that person. We've got new dev bugs on all
devs, accept for maybe devs who have been around since before recruiters
was put in place, and recruiters has been around for at least 2 years.
meaning those who we don't have new dev bugs on have been around for
quite a while.


On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Grant Goodyear wrote:

> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:20:15 -0500
> From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
> Reply-To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
> To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o, gentoo-core@l.g.o
> Subject: [gentoo-nfp] Foundation membership, take 2
>
> (Note: I'm cross-posting to -core, but I'd appreciate it if responses
> could be on -nfp, since that way we have a public record.)
>
> Here's a revised version of Stuart's suggestion for a Foundation
> membership policy:
>
>   * All Gentoo devs are automatically Foundation members
>   * Each Foundation member must explicitly request his/her
>     right to vote on an annual basis.
>
> I'm sure that Stuart could whip up in 10 minutes or less some sort of
> web-based application that our devs could use to register to vote.  I'd
> also be happy with the notion that actually voting would implicitly
> include a registration to vote.
>
> If at all possible, I'd like to reach some sort of consensus this week.
> If you hate this idea and have another, now's the time to speak up.
>
> Best,
> g2boojum
>

-- 
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure -
dmwaters@g.o
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org

--
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list