1 |
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 23:53 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> Chris Gianelloni wrote: [Mon Apr 11 2005, 03:08:02PM CDT] |
3 |
> > Enemy Territory, though free, has a restriction that would keep us from |
4 |
> > distributing it in "modified form", which includes the installed form. |
5 |
> > The only form that we can provide it in is the installer itself. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > If I wanted to get permission from Id to make, say, the old Gentoo Games |
8 |
> > Enemy Territory CD and redistribute it, they would need to grant a |
9 |
> > specific license to the Foundation to allow this, correct? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Now, who/what would that license cover? The Foundation? All the |
12 |
> > developers? Our mirrors? |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > What legal bindings does the Foundation have to say, developer Y? Can |
15 |
> > the Foundation engage in legal contracts on the behalf of Gentoo Linux? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Good question. I have to admit that I have no idea what the answer |
18 |
> might be. I would think that the Foundation could, and probably should, |
19 |
> engage in legal contracts on the behalf of Gentoo devs. The tricky part |
20 |
> is that I'm not sure what, if any, ability the Foundation has to ensure |
21 |
> that Gentoo devs live up to their part of the bargain. |
22 |
|
23 |
That's pretty much what I'm afraid of... |
24 |
|
25 |
I know that I would like to pursue some possible arrangements with other |
26 |
companies, especially as I am now getting quite close to producing some |
27 |
fun GameCD images, and quite a few of the "free" games from standard |
28 |
game production houses have restrictions on redistributing them in any |
29 |
form other than their original. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Chris Gianelloni |
33 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
34 |
Games - Developer |
35 |
Gentoo Linux |