| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 03 Jun 2018, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Not having a quorum prevents a vote of members taking place. |
| 4 |
> However, there has never been a need for a vote of members at any |
| 5 |
> meeting of members. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Why do we have meetings of members then? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Due to the difficulties of counting both votes and members present, |
| 10 |
> I don't think an IRC 'show of hands' can ever be relied on. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I'm not against the proposed change, I just think its changing from |
| 13 |
> one value that is not useful, to a different value that is also not |
| 14 |
> useful. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
With the current number of about 90 to 100 members. the one-tenth |
| 17 |
quorum would be 10 members being present during a meeting. This should |
| 18 |
be quite possible to achieve. Plus, I don't see why a roll call would |
| 19 |
be difficult. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Ulrich |
Archives