| 1 |
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:23 +0000, Steve Long wrote: |
| 2 |
> Apparently these need to be re-posted. |
| 3 |
> I hereby nominate: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> g2boojum |
| 6 |
> reasons already given, others have made further points in support. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> zmedico |
| 9 |
> perhaps the most useful code developer Gentoo currently has, but more |
| 10 |
> importantly perhaps the most level-headed dev as well. excellent at putting |
| 11 |
> the needs of Gentoo above his own personal feelings, despite much |
| 12 |
> provocation. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> pauldv |
| 15 |
> an old-school original. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> seemant |
| 18 |
> the same. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> solar |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Gentoo is to important to depend on guys like me. In real life I'm a |
| 23 |
slacker. I don't pay my taxes on time. I barely clean my house. I pay my |
| 24 |
bills usually just often enough so services don't get shutoff. I slack |
| 25 |
even on going get stamps and mail off the checks. I'm fictitious. I |
| 26 |
don't respect authority. It would be a terrible choice to put these |
| 27 |
legal matters into my hands. Unless there is gold/silver/barter/money |
| 28 |
involved I slack. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> wltjr |
| 32 |
> perhaps the only dev who kept pushing to get this sorted out when everyone |
| 33 |
> else had forgotten about it. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> rl03 |
| 36 |
> only person who stood last time, and clearly has useful experience |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> NeddySeagoon |
| 39 |
> the grand old man! ;p *runs* |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> I especially don't think it's a good idea for people on the Council also to |
| 42 |
> be on the board of Trustees; burnout if nothing else, but the idea is that |
| 43 |
> these are two wholly separate entities. Close communication is important of |
| 44 |
> course, but I don't think any of the people I've nominated would make that at |
| 45 |
> all difficult. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives