1 |
On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 12:32 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 05:24:16PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
3 |
> > On 2019.07.14 15:40, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
4 |
> > [snip] |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > > This can be fixed by proper by-laws, ... |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > [snip] |
9 |
> > > -- |
10 |
> > > Cheers, |
11 |
> > > Aaron |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > That's over simplification. For things to get fixed, |
15 |
> > people have to do stuff. By-laws don't ensure |
16 |
> > anything gets done. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > -- |
19 |
> > Regards, |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > Roy Bamford |
22 |
> > (Neddyseagoon) a member of |
23 |
> > elections |
24 |
> > gentoo-ops |
25 |
> > forum-mods |
26 |
> > arm64 |
27 |
> |
28 |
> You are correct. It alone does not "fix it", but it does hold the board in |
29 |
> violation of retaining one. Which in turn means Section 5.6 comes into play for |
30 |
> the general membership. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> As other comments I have made stated, by-laws govern the trustees just as much |
33 |
> as the general membership. |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
No offense meant but reading your posts, I start feeling like your |
37 |
solution to all the problems boils down to 'force Trustees to fix them, |
38 |
and if they don't, then force them more'. I'm not yet sure if this |
39 |
involves pursuing legal responsibility on past Trustees (i.e. punishing |
40 |
them for trying to fix stuff but being unable to fix it entirely), or |
41 |
just pursuing current Trustees to the point that nobody will stand for |
42 |
elections. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Best regards, |
46 |
Michał Górny |