| 1 |
On 10-04-2018 21:37, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 |
> As discussed several times previously, I again request that Trustee |
| 3 |
> elections have a _reopen_nominations similar to council elections. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
The _reopen_nominations pseudo candidate was an "invention" for Council |
| 7 |
elections - it didn't exist before. |
| 8 |
IIRC, there was a debate about using _reopen_nominations for the |
| 9 |
Trustees election and the general consensus at the time was that since |
| 10 |
we haven't had too many candidates on the Foundation history and that as |
| 11 |
a legal body we need to have the seats filled, the _reopen_nominations |
| 12 |
candidate was "counter-productive". |
| 13 |
I don't recall any more if there was or not an argument about "pseudo |
| 14 |
candidates" not being admissible on a "legal ballot". |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Jorge |
Archives