Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Points to Ponder for Sundays Meeting.
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:47:33
Message-Id: 47b8f6970804190547o6743adb2m95ed3d26f6f3edf9@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Points to Ponder for Sundays Meeting. by Chris Gianelloni
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
5 > (Please don't reply to me directly, thanks)
6 >
7 >
8 > On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 00:19 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
9 > > As I see it today, we need a set of bylaws that we can live with as
10 > > soon as we can get them, then develop the bylaws as we develop the
11 > > Foundation.
12 >
13 > OK, than allow me to suggest that the current proposal for gaining
14 > membership is fine, but I dislike the timeout. I don't think that
15 > someone should be forced to remain a developer just to be a Foundation
16 > member.
17 >
18 > Perhaps if it were worded more so that it allowed for someone to retain
19 > their status only if they vote. That should be close enough to the
20 > current way things are without forcing people out.
21 >
22
23 I agree with the points Chris raised on the previous mail and with his
24 proposal on the timeout.
25
26 >
27 >
28 > --
29 > Chris Gianelloni
30 > Release Engineering Strategic Lead
31 > Games Developer
32 > --
33 > gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list
34 >
35 >
36
37 Regards,
38
39 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
40 Gentoo- forums/userrel/Sparc/KDE
41
42 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
43 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
44 Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
45
46 iEYEARECAAYFAkgJ6T4ACgkQcAWygvVEyAIokQCfaXSkeMKQWgGxl+aZPRP9EUEQ
47 M+IAn0WVKFJ7wSox7GOOd3wjpGTjnX8t
48 =2uI3
49 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
50 --
51 gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list