1 |
I kind of like this idea, this would make the transision for new people |
2 |
much easier with those who already have experience to help them along if |
3 |
that makes sense... |
4 |
|
5 |
As for the number of trustees, I do like the fact that there's an odd |
6 |
number on the current board so that there can't be a locked decision. |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Brad Cowan wrote: |
10 |
|
11 |
> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:03:57 -0400 |
12 |
> From: Brad Cowan <bcowan@g.o> |
13 |
> To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o |
14 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Thoughts on upcoming trustee elections |
15 |
> |
16 |
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 10:15 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> > Ideally, I'd like to have trustee elections finished by 16 May. Of |
19 |
> > course, that means we need to decide how to handle the elections. |
20 |
> > Here's a proposal: |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > 1. Trustee wannabees need to e-mail -nfp with a statement to that |
23 |
> > effect. Any eligible foundation member may run for a trustee |
24 |
> > position. The deadline for announcing candidacy is one week prior |
25 |
> > to the beginning of voting. |
26 |
> > 2. A ballot containing the names of all candidates will be assembled |
27 |
> > which essentially just has a check box for each name. |
28 |
> > 3. Voting will last for one week. |
29 |
> > 4. All candidates who reach or surpass a threshold of 50% yes votes |
30 |
> > are thereby elected as trustees. |
31 |
> > 5. In the case that fewer than four trustees are elected outright (I believe |
32 |
> > that by NM law there needs to be a president, a secretary, a |
33 |
> > treasurer, and possibly something else?), then the top four vote |
34 |
> > recipients are elected as trustees. |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > Notice that I didn't say that it was necessarily a good proposal. I'd |
37 |
> > like to avoid needing an initial vote on how many trustees are needed, |
38 |
> > so this proposal deliberately leaves the number of trustees that one |
39 |
> > wants to vote for up to the individual members. The threshold of 50% |
40 |
> > was picked entirely at random. Better ideas cheerfully accepted! |
41 |
> |
42 |
> This seems reasonable to me, but I have a few small questions. Has |
43 |
> the number of trustees been decided? ie...are we sticking with the |
44 |
> current number or possibly less? Also, what about having say 2 year |
45 |
> terms with elections held every year, essentially splitting up the |
46 |
> trustees so that there's no possibility that all be voted out at once? |
47 |
> This would allow a continuous "voice" of the board. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Thanks, |
50 |
> |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - |
54 |
dmwaters@g.o |
55 |
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
56 |
|
57 |
-- |
58 |
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list |