| 1 |
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 08:25 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 15:06 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> [snip] |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > I understand the reasons you and others have |
| 7 |
> > raised, but in my view this should be left to the voters - it is (or |
| 8 |
> > should be) their choice in the end. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I tend to agree with this statement. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I guess everyone forgets my calls for that a long time ago. Much less |
| 13 |
that I was trying to go through the bylaws section by section. So all |
| 14 |
could feel they were involved and had some say. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I am so sick of all this crap. Which explains why I resigned. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Now we have someone from infra and elections commenting on voting. I |
| 19 |
hope action is taken to provide resources for such. Because if the |
| 20 |
trustees wanted to call a vote on such matters right now. Could they? |
| 21 |
How long before the voting could take place? How long would it last for? |
| 22 |
Who is eligible to vote? What if the vote outcome does not reflect the |
| 23 |
desire of the outspoken minority? Will it be accepted when it's not now? |
| 24 |
What will the appeal process to voting be? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Funny how bylaws don't address the voting decision making process. But |
| 27 |
no one is taking issue there :) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Talk is cheap and I am soo sick of it. Show me the $, take action, then |
| 30 |
speak. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives