1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 2008.09.02 16:06, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> My personal opinion is that making this a rule is wrong and can prove |
7 |
> to be counter-productive. I understand the reasons you and others |
8 |
> have raised, but in my view this should be left to the voters - it is |
9 |
> (or |
10 |
> should be) their choice in the end. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> -- |
13 |
> Regards, |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org |
16 |
> Gentoo- forums / Userrel / SPARC / KDE |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
Jorge, |
20 |
|
21 |
The three remaining trustees were also nominated to stand for election |
22 |
for the council. Had they all accepted and been elected to the council, |
23 |
today we would be in the position of having trustees being a subset of |
24 |
council. That would have totally destroyed the council/foundation split |
25 |
that was one of the reasons the two bodies were created. |
26 |
|
27 |
We need rules to stop that situation from occuring. |
28 |
|
29 |
If we are to remove the council/foundation split and adopt a more |
30 |
normal corporate structure, lets do it deliberately with the changes to |
31 |
both council and foundation to make a single workable body capable of |
32 |
dealing with all aspects of Gentoo and without holding back development |
33 |
rather than find we have done it accidently by electing the same people |
34 |
to both bodies. |
35 |
|
36 |
The opinions expressed here are my own, not the opinions of the Gentoo |
37 |
Foundation Inc. |
38 |
|
39 |
- -- |
40 |
Regards, |
41 |
|
42 |
Roy Bamford |
43 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
44 |
gentoo-ops |
45 |
forum-mods |
46 |
treecleaners |
47 |
trustees |
48 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
49 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
50 |
|
51 |
iEYEARECAAYFAki9YD8ACgkQTE4/y7nJvas8iwCeK9GYkJeQIxMYlRMlrHs885U/ |
52 |
IcIAoLSOMUlcY1qFLWI8GxyQNFv0iR3s |
53 |
=WwG9 |
54 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |