1 |
The foundation currently has 1 member type (in the bylaws) but Gentoo |
2 |
itself still seems to have 2 (Gentoo staff and Ebuild developer) |
3 |
|
4 |
This motion represents an idea that the community itself would only have 1 |
5 |
contributor type. |
6 |
|
7 |
1) Contributors must take the staff quiz (which we should rename to the |
8 |
contributor quiz.) |
9 |
|
10 |
2) Contributors are encouraged to be foundation members, but membership is |
11 |
not required. We may amend the contributor onboarding process to offer |
12 |
foundation membership at the time they join Gentoo as a contributor. |
13 |
|
14 |
3) Contributors that want access to the gentoo ebuild repository still need |
15 |
to follow the normal recruiting process (ebuild quiz, mentor, 30 day |
16 |
period.) |
17 |
|
18 |
4) Contributors that do not want access to the gentoo ebuild repository |
19 |
(because they contribute in other ways) do not need to take the ebuild |
20 |
quiz. Its unclear if a 30 day grace period is required for non-ebuild |
21 |
groups. |
22 |
|
23 |
5) Existing developers and staff are rebranded as contributors. |
24 |
|
25 |
If approved, I expect a few months of working with comrel to adjust |
26 |
existing policy documents and recruiting guidelines to implement. |
27 |
|
28 |
-A |