| 1 |
On 2018.06.04 16:16, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:04 AM Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > It would be possible for Trustees (5) to be a subset of Council (7). |
| 6 |
> > Council ask for something, then effectively vote themselves the |
| 7 |
> funding. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> How is that different from the status quo, where the Trustees can ask |
| 11 |
> for something, and then effectively vote themselves the funding? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
Good point, well made. Its already happened too. |
| 14 |
Anyone can do the due diligence. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> IMO Trustees being identical to Council would be the ideal state, |
| 17 |
> because it would eliminate half of the conflicts we've seen in the |
| 18 |
> last year. Having two different bodies with different agendas both |
| 19 |
> trying to push the community in different directions seems |
| 20 |
> self-destructive. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The two bodies are supposed to have different agendas. They have |
| 23 |
different terms of reference. GLEP 39 for the council, |
| 24 |
The NM statutes, Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws for the Foundation. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
We have seen some conflict arising in areas of overlap but I don't see |
| 27 |
conflict as necessarily self-destructive. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> Rich |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Regards, |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Roy Bamford |
| 39 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 40 |
elections |
| 41 |
gentoo-ops |
| 42 |
forum-mods |
Archives