1 |
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 21:16 +0000, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> I believe we should establish a mailing list for foundation members |
5 |
> only just to handle this sort of situation. Maybe something like |
6 |
> foundation@g.o |
7 |
|
8 |
Pretty sure this is it :) I thought about mentioning that, but then |
9 |
that's just creating another list. When this one pretty much exists |
10 |
already for that purpose. So it's mostly a matter of making sure those |
11 |
on the member roster are also signed up to the -nfp mailing lists. |
12 |
|
13 |
Granted some have stated they don't want to be members. But those that |
14 |
are members. We can surely impose the requirement to be on -nfp. Almost |
15 |
have direct control over that via infra :). Short of them removing |
16 |
themselves, us adding them back, so on and so forth. :( |
17 |
|
18 |
> I don't see how to do a petition --- perhaps my |
19 |
> brain is numb by now --- but it would be a bit easier I think if we can |
20 |
> do it. |
21 |
|
22 |
Yeah, that's the ideal way to go for any group actions 10% or more of |
23 |
the members would like to see the foundation take or act upon. Meeting |
24 |
or not, but likely would be decided upon at a meeting. Indirect call for |
25 |
a meeting either way. |
26 |
|
27 |
But I am with you, I like to think of myself as creative. But have |
28 |
little to no thoughts atm how we could go about an electronic petition. |
29 |
What happens when I go into business mode from creative and |
30 |
development :( |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
34 |
amd64/Java/Trustees |
35 |
Gentoo Foundation |