1 |
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:43 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: [Tue Jan 29 2008, 02:40:14PM CST] |
3 |
> > Um, didn't you re-nominate me with others earlier? :) |
4 |
> |
5 |
> You're not a nominee because you haven't accepted the nomination. |
6 |
|
7 |
Just did it for the formality/technicality. If it's not clear that I |
8 |
accept it without having to state it, based on past posting and efforts |
9 |
so far. Maybe I shouldn't accept ;) BS stuff like this makes me kinda |
10 |
want to decline. |
11 |
|
12 |
If we repeat the nomination process again for what ever reason and I am |
13 |
re-nominated. I accept in advance ;) Can we move on already instead of |
14 |
stupid things like this :) |
15 |
|
16 |
Had the process been started a bit more officially and properly in the |
17 |
first place, we wouldn't be re-nominating and re-accepting. |
18 |
|
19 |
> That said, I'm declining the nomination on my behalf. I'll be available |
20 |
> to help, but I can do that without being a Trustee. |
21 |
|
22 |
That's to bad, but likely time wise is justified much less having |
23 |
already served a term. As long as you are around to help and advise when |
24 |
need be. Should be fine :) |
25 |
|
26 |
Ideally any past trustees, like the previous board. Would remain around |
27 |
and available as advisers to the existing board members if needed. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
31 |
Gentoo/amd64/Java |