Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-nfp
begin quote
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:47:39 -0600
"Daniel Robbins" <drobbins@g.o> wrote:
>
> Kurt clearly explained why the coop needs to be a separate entity from
> the main NFP. The coop is a good thing in itself. But combined with
> the NFP, the coop will first make setting up the NFP take way too
> long. Second, it will completely change the way decisions are made on
> the project, which people don't want. It will undermine developer
> authority, which developers obviously don't want. I was mistakenly
> trying to accomplish too many things under one roof by suggesting that
> we have a coop be the main entity for Gentoo.
>
> So the coop and the NFP need to be a separate entity. The NFP will be
> set up first, then we will worry about funding issues that can be
> addressed by setting up a coop.
>
> Just want to make sure that everyone knows my corrected opinion on
> this.
Would you please post this to -core as well, since thats where a lot of
this discussion was first introduced to people ( the meeting log for
one )
Otherwise, I'm glad for the separation, and I'm quite optimistic about
what the coop would be able to produce. It does give some hope for the
future.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
|
|