List Archive: gentoo-nfp
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2008.04.18 23:25, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 20:42 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
> It's my personal opinion that the Foundation should have the ability
> control its own membership. Currently, membership is decided by an
> external third party (the Gentoo distribution's Developer Relations
> team) and based on some fairly arbitrary term of service. That
> out great for the *original* Foundation, but really needs to be
> rethought. Remember guys, you have the ability to rebuild the
> Foundation how you see fit. Don't pass up this opportunity because
> history or the status quo. Do what you think is best and everybody
> be damned. ;]
> Chris Gianelloni
> Release Engineering Strategic Lead
> Games Developer
> email@example.com mailing list
I'm glad there is some debate going on. I agree with everything you
Non Gentoo Developers will probably contribute more to the foundation
than ebuild developers (they don't have the same focus on software) and
in the long term, that's the way I want to see the Foundation go. Allow
me to refer you to my election manifesto.
As I see it today, we need a set of bylaws that we can live with as
soon as we can get them, then develop the bylaws as we develop the
I believe that its essential to the long term survival of the Gentoo
Foundation to open up Foundation membership to the whole community.
I'm aware that not everyone shares that view so I would rather have
some agreed bylaws that we can build on than spend the rest of our
first term of office failing to ratify any bylaws at all.
I'm sure if we make the changes in small steps, we will make faster
progress than going for the big bang.
(NeddySeagoon) a member of
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list