-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grant Goodyear wrote:
> As for the idea of having two-year terms, I tend to think that our
> turnover is just too high for that.  It's rare for devs to be active for
> two years, and a two-year term essentially requires that they be active
> for three years (with the first year required for foundation
> membership).

How about this. We have the first election, but the half with the most
votes get 18-month terms -- just this once! That will set up a six-month
staggering of re-elections for half the seats each time, with standard
1-year terms after that.

If that's too often, there are alternate possibilities, like doing the
same thing at 12 and 18 months, or 9 and 12, etc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCb/58XVaO67S1rtsRAs+MAJ9L3pu8gaQHfwT+aHYG3EMBcqVCfgCgnMlz
R+xdCA/MR6dlNTPdaMKX76k=
=cXei
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list