Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-nfp
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-nfp@g.o
From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
Subject: Re: Foundation update
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:10:08 -0600
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: [Fri Jan 18 2008, 04:25:54PM CST]
> Does the SFC have adequate funding? Seemed like they were very tight on
> funds, and even if we had a our ducks in a row. All things per their
> list and likings. They have no $ for us.

I'll leave that up to the SFC to decide.  Some time ago the SFC issued
us an invitation to join them, and explained what doing so would mean 
(see http://www.grantgoodyear.org/g2blog/gentoo/20070717-sflc.html
for details).  Neither they nor us are committed to anything right now,
but sending them the information they requested would allow them to make
a decision.  We could then decide to go with them, somebody else, or
keep things going ourselves.

> Much less if they have never managed an entity like that. Why are you so
> confident they can handle us and our problems? Not meant to be
> confrontational, just curious your thoughts there.

Mostly because they problems we face are similar to the problems their
other projects face--preserving and protecting trademarks and
copyrights, handling finances, etcetera.

> Seems like them being new, lack of adequate funding, and lack of
> experience managing an entity like ours, much less our size. Seems like
> a very risky proposition.

Not really, as far as I can tell.  They're likely to do a better job
than we've been doing, since I think we could trust them to file the
appropriate paperwork, at least.  That said, their contract with us
would have an "escape clause".  At any time we could take our assets and
set up a new Foundation, and they'll help us do it.

> IMHO the SPI is WAY better. More established, been around longer.
> Manages Debian, used to do Gnome, etc. Likely has enough funding, surely
> enough experience, etc.

That may be true, and if somebody wants to contact the folks at SPI,
please feel free.  It's not like we'd be joining the SFC tomorrow, no
matter what happens.

I hope that helps,
g2boojum
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@g.o
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
Attachment:
pgpGIsqZCEnPE.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Foundation update
-- William L. Thomson Jr.
References:
Foundation update
-- Grant Goodyear
Re: Foundation update
-- William L. Thomson Jr.
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Foundation update
Next by thread:
Re: Foundation update
Previous by date:
Re: Foundation update
Next by date:
Re: Foundation update


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.