| 1 |
Nope, it was not a response to you. But I see that things are being |
| 2 |
done the wrong way, probably because of inexperience. If people are so |
| 3 |
commonly violating our CoC, then maybe it is our CoC what needs to be |
| 4 |
fixed and not our developers. In any case, I just want to say that I |
| 5 |
am very confused about all the situation and in the same time sad to |
| 6 |
see that indeed people that try to get things done are meeting a wall |
| 7 |
in front of them. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
In this situation, looking at it in a cold way, I think that Chrissy |
| 10 |
has abused a little her position. I do not say it is her fault, these |
| 11 |
things happen. I want to ask for a little more of moderation and |
| 12 |
diplomacy when dealing with these situations and not with |
| 13 |
zero-tolerance. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 18:04 +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: |
| 18 |
>> Congratulations on removing yet another developer. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> If this is directly in response to me. Then you should be aware I had |
| 21 |
> nothing to do with his moderation. So I'd suggest you slow down and read |
| 22 |
> everything that has transpired on this list. He is not the be-all end |
| 23 |
> all of gentoo or even remotely close to it. And if he wants to prove his |
| 24 |
> worth to gentoo in a non abusive manner. Then the tree is the perfect |
| 25 |
> place. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> But if for a second anybody thinks that somebody can run around and be |
| 28 |
> abusive to others and violate our CoC at will. Then heck yeah. I'd be |
| 29 |
> pleased with them getting off a list/or out of gentoo all together so |
| 30 |
> distro matters can continue. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0x47F370A0 |
Archives