Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-nfp
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@g.o>
From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>
Subject: Re: Section 2.1 New Mexico
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:37:52 -0400
Please reply on list :)

On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 01:33 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>
> I think we might as well leave it there. Although it's a legal
> requirement, I don't think it does any harm to make it explicit on the
> bylaws.

More to read, no USE flag for by_laws_minimal :)

Why not trim the fat, so it's a quicker read?

-- 
William L. Thomson Jr.
amd64/Java/Trustees
Gentoo Foundation

Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
References:
Section 2.1 New Mexico
-- William L. Thomson Jr.
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Fwd: Section 2.1 New Mexico
Next by thread:
Section 2.2 Other States
Previous by date:
Fwd: Section 2.1 New Mexico
Next by date:
Re: Section 2.2 Other States


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.