1 |
On Sunday 03 August 2008 17:01:10 gentoo-nfp+help@l.g.o wrote: |
2 |
> Another option, that might be fit our role more is some direct or online |
3 |
> banking. ING.com is one of the biggest ones. Capital One is another one |
4 |
> but I don't care for them as a company .. personal preference. That |
5 |
> would get by the problem of having to be close by. |
6 |
|
7 |
(Following the list via digest mode.) |
8 |
|
9 |
Compass Bank is another 100% online bank. I don't know a lot about them, but |
10 |
do know I get a decent amount of their cards thru at work, so people use 'em. |
11 |
100% online, they sand you a card and you can do business at any ATM. They |
12 |
refund ATM fees up to X dollars per transaction. |
13 |
|
14 |
But I've no idea on business accounts with them, and no idea if they require |
15 |
direct deposit or just that you use an ATM for deposits as well. |
16 |
|
17 |
100% online, tho, so there shouldn't be restrictions on locality, except that |
18 |
their ATM fee refunds might not cover the full amount of non-US transactions. |
19 |
|
20 |
Due to the strengthened banking laws after 9/11, pretty much anything in the |
21 |
US is going to require ID verification of some sort. However, I'm not |
22 |
certain it would have to be all officers, and since faxed documents are held |
23 |
to be legally valid in the US, I'm guessing that's how something that's 100% |
24 |
online would work, fax them the IDs. It's possible they'd need notarized, |
25 |
but notaries are pretty common. |
26 |
|
27 |
Just throwing another option out there. At least here, ask anyone to name an |
28 |
online bank, and Compass is likely the name that would come up. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Duncan - Plain text mail please, HTML mail filtered as spam |
32 |
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little |
33 |
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." |
34 |
Benjamin Franklin |