Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-nfp
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-nfp@g.o
From: Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o>
Subject: Re: Fw: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:14:15 -0400
Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote:
> I don't see any of this addressing distribution of a binary patch, 
> which is fairly reasonable, as it tries to make it as legally
> difficult to create one as possible, so the possibility of
> distrubution does not occur.
> 
> Adobe must know the patch exists. Since the above does not appear to 
> address the distrubution of a patch that is not supposed to exist,
> has anyone asked Adobe about distrubution of the patch ?

The good news is that this is no longer an issue.  The next version is
promised to work with libcurl.so.4 and fallback to libcurl.so.3 if
necessary. [1]

Thanks for the input!

[1] http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2008/08/curl_tradeoffs.html

-- 
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo Developer (rox/fluxbox/gkrellm)
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
Fw: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation
-- Jim Ramsay
Re: Fw: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation
-- Roy Bamford
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Fw: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation
Next by thread:
Gentoo Foundation Inc Trustees - Adjourned August Meeting
Previous by date:
Re: Fw: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation
Next by date:
Gentoo Foundation Inc Trustees - Adjourned August Meeting


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-nfp mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.