Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote:
> I don't see any of this addressing distribution of a binary patch, 
> which is fairly reasonable, as it tries to make it as legally
> difficult to create one as possible, so the possibility of
> distrubution does not occur.
> 
> Adobe must know the patch exists. Since the above does not appear to 
> address the distrubution of a patch that is not supposed to exist,
> has anyone asked Adobe about distrubution of the patch ?

The good news is that this is no longer an issue.  The next version is
promised to work with libcurl.so.4 and fallback to libcurl.so.3 if
necessary. [1]

Thanks for the input!

[1] http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2008/08/curl_tradeoffs.html

-- 
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo Developer (rox/fluxbox/gkrellm)